• SubScribe commentary
  • The schedule
    • Celebrities >
      • Robin Williams and suicide reporting
      • George Clooney v Daily Mail, round 3
      • Are we playing fair with celebrities?
      • L'Wren Scott's death and Mick Jagger's grief
      • Jill Dando
      • Alain de Botton and Philip Seymour Hoffman
      • Wendi Deng and Rebekah Wade love letters
      • Elizabeth Hurley
      • Gwyneth Paltrow
      • William Roache
    • Crime >
      • The release of Harry Roberts
      • Alan Henning and Alice Gross
      • Dave Lee Travis and Operation Yewtree
      • Rotherham child sex exploitation
      • Operation Tuleta
      • Rolf Harris and Andy Coulson sentencing
      • Maxine Carr's wedding
      • Ann Maguire stabbing
      • Stephen Lawrence and police corruption: time to sit up and take notice
      • The Mirror and Jill Dando
      • William Roache acquitted
      • Rape cases never have a happy ending
      • Lee Rigby and the law of contempt
      • Michael Le Vell: don't shoot the messenger
      • Madeleine McCann: missing an opportunity
      • Maria the 'Greek Madeleine'
    • Foreign Affairs >
      • David Haines and Isis propaganda
      • The murder of Steven Sotloff
      • James Foley murdered
      • Nigeria's abducted girls and massacre
      • Kidnapped Nigerian schoolgirls
      • Al Jazeera on trial: why should we care about journalists?
      • Al Jazeera on trial: the final session
      • Al Jazeera on trial: Abdullah Elshamy
      • Al Jazeera on trial: Peter Greste
      • Al Jazeera on trial: the court hearings
      • Peter Greste sent back to jail as Al-Jazeera journalists' trial is adjourned
      • Al-Jazeera journalists refused bail in Egypt
      • Frontline reporting
      • Putin, the Man of Destiny, and dreams of a Eurasian empire
      • Putin wants more than Crimea, he wants half of Ukraine
      • Ukraine revolution and the threat to the West
      • Obama's selfie
      • Typhoon Haiyan
    • Gender Issues >
      • It takes all sorts to make a family
      • This is what a flawed feminist campaign looks like
      • A level results day: bring on the token boys
      • Kellie Maloney faces the world
      • Cheerleading
      • Pregnant soldiers
      • Women in trouble for getting ahead
      • Doris Lessing, Helen Mirren and silly sexist tokenism
      • Bank notes campaign
    • Health and Beauty >
      • Ebola
      • Ashya King and the force of authority
      • Robin Williams and suicide reporting
      • Sun boobs with page 3 breast cancer campaign
      • Stephen's story: did the Press help his cause or take over his life?
      • Anorexia, bulimia and high-achieving students
      • Colchester cancer scandal
      • New year diets
      • Food for thought: will red meat kill you?
    • Obituary >
      • Robin Williams and suicide reporting
      • Chapman Pincher
      • Rik Mayall and the trouble with death
      • Tony Benn: why we shouldn't speak ill of the dead
      • Thatcher and Crow: speaking ill of the dead
      • Bob Crow wins last media battle
      • Fred Sanger
      • Nelson Mandela
      • Doris Lessing
    • Politics >
      • Poppymania
      • Cameron's tax cut promise
      • Brooks Newmark sting
      • Scottish referendum >
        • Scottish referendum: the final editions
        • Scottish referendum miscellany
        • The Queen speaks
      • Politicians need their holidays too
      • Cameron's reshuffle: bring on the women
      • Food banks
      • The European elections audit >
        • Election audit: the last wordle
        • Election audit: Daily Mail
        • Election audit: The Times
        • Election audit: Daily Express
        • Election audit: Daily Mirror
        • Election audit: The Independent
        • Election audit: Guardian
        • Election audit: Daily Telegraph
        • Election audit: The Sun
      • Maria Miller
      • The blue-rinse bingo Budget
      • Harman, Hewitt and the paedophiles
      • Hewitt apologises and the Sun picks up the cudgels
      • Mail v Labour trio, day 6: Harman capitulates and the bully wins
      • David Miranda detention matters to us all
      • Education >
        • A level results day: bring on the token boys
      • Immigration >
        • A year of xenophobia
        • The Express and immigration
      • The Royal Family >
        • Prince Charles and the floods
        • Prince George
      • Sport >
        • Cheerleading
        • Kelly Gallagher beats the world
        • Why is football more important than all the news?
        • Jenny Jones struggles against Kate and ManU
      • The weather >
        • Smog
  • Journalists in court
  • Phone hacking
  • The Brooks-Coulson trial
    • Hacking trial: sentences
    • Hacking trial: commentary
    • Hacking trial: background
    • Hacking trial: reportage and comment
    • Hacking trial: press coverage
    • Hacking trial: verdict and reaction
    • Hacking trial: sentencing hearing
    • Hacking trial: mitigation
    • Hacking trial: Rebekah speaks
    • Hacking trial: mainstream Press
    • Hacking trial: periodicals
    • Hacking trial: Guardian
    • Hacking trial: Independent
    • Hacking trial: The Times
    • Hacking trial: Daily Telegraph
    • Hacking trial: The whitetops
    • Hacking trial: The redtops
    • Hacking trial: evidence
  • Nationals
    • Express
    • Guardian
    • Independent
    • The i
    • Mail
    • Mirror
    • Daily Star
    • Sun
    • Telegraph
    • Times
  • OpEd
    • OpEd: UK politics 24-12-14
    • OpEd: 23-12-14 Christmas
    • OpEd: 22-12-14 UK politics
    • OpEd: 19-12-14 North Korea
    • OpEd: 18-12-14 British politics
    • OpEd: 17-12-14 UK politics
    • OpEd: 16-12-14 UK politics
    • OpEd: CIA torture 15-12-14
    • OpEd: UK politics 12-12-14
    • OpEd: CIA torture 11-12-14
    • OpEd: CIA torture 10-12-14
    • OpEd: British politics 09-12-14
    • OpEd: British politics 08-12-14
    • OpEd: Autumn Statement 05-12-14
    • OpEd: Autumn Statement 04-12-14
    • OpEd: Autumn Statement 03-12-14
    • OpEd: Gordon Brown 02-12-14
    • OpEd: Black Friday 01-12-14
    • OpEd: Scottish finance 28-11-14
    • OpEd: European politics 27-11-14
    • OpEd: David Mellor 26-11-14
    • OpEd: Lewis Hamilton 25-11-14
    • OpEd: British politics 24-11-14
    • OpEd: British politics 21-11-14
    • OpEd: British politics 20-11-14
    • OpEd: British politics 19-11-14
    • OpEd: British politics 18-11-14
    • OpEd: British politics 17-11-14
    • OpEd: Labour 14-11-14
    • OpEd: forex scandal 13-11-14
    • OpEd: British politics 12-11-14
    • OpEd: the Labour Party 11-11-14
    • OpEd: Ed Miliband 10-11-14
    • OpEd: British politics 07-11-14
    • OpEd: British politics 06-11-14
    • OpEd: British politics 05-11-14
    • OpEd: British politics 04-11-14
    • OpEd: space tourism 03-11-14
    • OpEd: British politics 31-10-14
    • OpEd: immigration 30-10-14
    • OpEd: immigration 29-10-14
    • OpEd: British politics 28-10-14
    • OpEd: British politics 27-10-14
    • OpEd: NHS 24-10-14
    • OpEd: British politics 23-10-14
    • OpEd: Ukip 22-10-14
    • OpEd: Britain and EU 21-10-14
    • OpEd: British politics 20-10-14
    • OpEd: Lord Freud 17-10-14
    • OpEd: British politics 16-10-14
    • OpEd: British politics 15-10-14
    • OpEd: British politics 14-10-14
    • OpEd: British politics 13-10-14
    • OpEd: Isis and UK politics 10-10-14
    • OpEd: British politics 09-10-14
    • OpEd: British politics 08-09-14
    • OpEd: LibDem conference 07-10-14
    • OpEd: British politics 06-10-14
    • OpEd: party conferences 03-10-14
    • OpEd: Cameron's speech 02-10-14
    • OpEd: Conservative conference 01-10-14
    • OpEd: Conservative conference 30-09-14
    • OpEd: Conservative conference 29-09-14
    • OpEd: War on Isis 26-09-14
    • OpEd: Labour conference 25-09-14
    • OpEd: Miliband's speech 24-09-14
    • OpEd: Labour conference 23-09-14
    • OpEd: Referendum fallout 22-09-14
    • OpEd: Scottish referendum 19-09-14
    • OpEd: Scottish referendum 18-09-14
    • OpEd: Scottish referendum 17-09-14
    • OpEd: Scottish referendum 16-09-14
    • OpEd: Scottish referendum 15-09-14
    • OpEd: Scottish referendum 12-09-14
    • OpEd: Scottish referendum 11-09-14
    • OpEd: Scottish referendum 10-09-14
    • OpEd: Scottish referendum 09-09-14
    • OpEd: Scottish referendum 08-09-14
    • OpEd: Scottish referendum 05-09-14
    • OpEd: Nato and Isis threat 04-09-14
    • OpEd: Scottish independence 03-09-14
    • OpEd: Nude photographs 02-09-14
    • OpEd: British politics 01-09-14
    • OpEd: Ukip defection 29-08-14
    • OpEd: Rotherham sex abuse 28-08-14
    • OpEd: Islamic militants 27-08-14
    • OpEd: Middle East 26-08-14
    • OpEd: James Foley 22-08-14
    • OpEd: James Foley 21-08-14
    • OpEd: British politics 20-08-14
    • OpEd: Iraq 19-08-14
    • OpEd: Iraq 18-08-14
    • OpEd: A levels 15-08-14
    • OpEd: Iraq 14-08-14
    • OpEd: Robin Williams 13-08-14
    • OpEdL Iraq 12-08-14
    • OpEd: Iraq 11-08-14
    • OpEd: Boris Johnson 08-08-14
    • OpEd: Boris Johnson 07-08-14
    • OpEd: Warsi resignation 06-08-14
    • OpEd: First World War centenary 05-08-14
    • OpEd: Gaza 04-08-14
    • OpEd: British politics 01-08-14
    • OpEd: Gaza 31-07-14
    • OpEd: British politics 30-07-14
    • OpEd: British politics 29-07-14
    • OpEd: Gaza 28-07-14
    • OpEd: Gaza 25-07-14
    • OpEd: EU and Russia 24-07-14
    • OpEd: Flight MH17 23-07-14
    • OpEd: Flight MH17 22-07-14
    • OpEd: Flight MH17 21-07-14
    • oped: Gaza 18-07-14
    • OpEd: Cameron's reshuffle 17-07-14
    • OpEd: Cameron's reshuffle 16-07-14
    • OpEd: Cameron's reshuffle 15-07-14
    • OpEd: British politics 14-07-2014
    • OpEd: public sector strikes 11-07-14
    • OpEd: public sector strikes 10-07-14
    • OpEd: sex abuse 09-07-14
    • OpEd Sex abuse 08-07-14
    • OpEd: Westminster child abuse 07-07-2014
    • OpEd: Middle East 04-07-14
    • OpEd: Ed Miliband 03-07-14
    • OpEd British politics: 02-07-14
    • OpEd: edeucation 01-07-14
    • OpEd: Britain and Europe 30-06-14
    • OpEd: Britain and Europe 27-06-14
    • OpEd: Luis Suárez 26-06-14
    • OpEd: Iraq 25-06-14
    • OpEd: British politics 24-06-14
    • OpEd: Iraq 23-06-14
    • OpEd: Iraq 20-06-14
    • OpEd: British politics, 19-06-14
    • OpEd: British politics, 18-06-2014
    • OpEd: Iraq 17-06-14
    • OpEd: Tony Blair 16-06-14
    • OpEd: Iraq 13-06-14
    • OpEd: Oxfam, baby buggies, World Cup 12-06-14
    • OpEd: education and British values 11-06-14
    • OpEd: extremist education 10-06-14
    • OpEd: May v Gove 09-06-14
  • The columnists
  • Regionals
    • Regional Press Awards 2013
    • Local newspaper week
    • Local papers matter
    • Reading Chronicle and football hooliganism
    • Time for change
    • Monty's vision
    • The Full Monty: the Local World vision put into practice
    • The Pirates of Parkham
    • Colchester cancer scandal
  • Backnumbers
    • Weekend papers Dec 27-28
    • Front pages Dec 22-26, 2014
    • Weekend papers Dec 20-21
    • Front pages Dec 15-19
    • Weekend front pages Dec 13-14
    • Front pages Dec 8-12
    • Weekend papers Dec 6-7
    • Front pages Dec 1-5
    • Weekend papers Nov 29-30
    • Front pages Nov 24-28
    • Weekend papers Nov 22-23
    • Front pages Nov 17-21
    • Weekend papers Nov 15-16
    • Front pages Nov 10-14
    • Weekend papers Nov 8-9
    • Front pages Nov 3-7
    • Weekend papers Nov 1-2
    • Front pages Oct 27-31
    • Weekend papers Oct 25-26, 2014
    • Front pages Oct 20-24
    • Weekend papers Oct 18-19, 2014
    • Front pages Oct 12-17
    • Front pages Oct 5-11
    • Front pages Sept 28-Oct 4
    • front pages Sept 21-27
    • Front pages Sept 14-20
    • front pages Sept 7-13 2014
    • front pages Aug 31-Sep 6
    • Front pages Aug 24-30, 2014
    • Front pages August 17-23, 2014
    • Front pages, Aug 10-16, 2014
    • Front pages, Aug 3-9, 2014
    • Front pages July 27-August2, 2014
    • Front pages July 20-26, 2014
    • front pages July 13-19, 2014
    • Front pages: July 6-12, 2014
    • Front pages June 29-July 5, 2014
    • Front pages June 22-28, 2014
    • Front pages June 15-21
    • Front pages June 8-14, 2014
    • Front pages June 1-7, 2014
    • Nationals May 25-31
    • Front pages May 18-24 >
      • Press review: 24-05-14
      • Press review: 21-05-14
      • Press review: 20-05-14
    • Front pages May 11-17 >
      • Press review 15-05-14
      • Press review 14-05-14
      • Press review 13-05-14
      • Press review 12-05-14
    • front pages May 4-10, 2014 >
      • The review 09-05-14
      • The review 08-05-2014
      • The review 07-05-14
    • Front pages April 27-May 3 2014
    • Front pages April 20-26, 2014
    • Front pages April 13-19
    • Front pages April 6-12, 2014
    • The front pages March 30-April 5
    • The front pages March 23-29, 2014
    • front pages march 16-22
    • front pages March 9-15, 2014
    • front pages March 2-8, 2014
    • front pages Feb 23-Mar 1 2014
    • front pages Feb 16-22, 2014
    • The front pages Feb 9-15 2014
    • The front pages Feb 3-8, 2014
    • The front pages January 2014
  • You have to laugh
  • Blog archive
  • About SubScribe
  • Join the SubScribers
  • Contact us
  • Cookie policy


Are we playing fair with celebrities?

Clooney and Jolie
The phone hacking saga was not so much about crime as about power, according to Nick Davies, the man who broke the scandal.
Maybe, but the central commodity that was being traded was privacy.
The News of the World was far from alone in this. Other newspapers may protest that they did not indulge in phone hacking, but they have certainly published stories that the subjects didn't want out in the open.
Some - it would be nice to say most - will have been in the public interest. 
Lying, cheating, hypocrisy are all fair game. That much is simple.

It becomes more complicated when dealing with celebrities, especially those who make a habit of "invading their own privacy". An argument put forward frequently before, during and after Leveson was that stars who court publicity for their latest film, book or album, can't complain if they come under scrutiny when they aren't trying to promote something.
Angelina Jolie's latest film Maleficent was released at the end of May with all the fanfare the Disney machine can produce. It has already made more than $600m. Her stunning looks - she has been voted the world's most beautiful/sexy woman at least a dozen times - and her relationship with Brad Pitt have firmly established her at the top of the A-list tree. Add to this the couple's vast international family, her role as a UN ambassador and her openness about her mastectomy and we can see that there is an insatiable appetite for "news" of her activities.
At the start of her career, however, she projected a less wholesome image, talking openly of being "wild", of her sexuality and her love life. 
But does that mean that it's eternally open season on that  period of her life? The Daily Mail today devotes the top half of its front page to this puff:
Daily Mail puff
Is this how she is today? Is all this humanitarian stuff a charade? Or is this a sneak preview of her in character for a new film? We have to turn to pages 6 and 7 to find out.
There we discover that this film was apparently taken by a drug dealer who had been invited to "drop by" - code, we are told, for "bring me supplies" - fifteen years ago. The dealer, Franklin Meyer, says that he shot the 15-minute video of the actress talking on the phone to her father Jon Voight with her consent. 
Meyer didn't tell the Mail that, though. He told the National Enquirer. The Mail reproduces the quotes from the Enquirer's article, adds its own background and a page of video stills and there you have it, a double page spread.

mail 6-7 spread
The actress is not quoted in the piece. The final sentence of the article is "Jolie's representatives did not immediately return requests for comment." I love the "immediately", it's as though there was a five-minute opportunity and after that "we're going with it anyway".
 Readers are directed to the video online, but you don't have to go to the Mail's website to see it - you can see it on a dozen sites now, including the Express, Star and Mirror (but not the Sun).
Is this justified? Is it relevant to anything in Jolie's life now or to society in general? Fleet Street Fox writes for the Mirror that Jolie is to be applauded for picking herself up from this state at age 24 to achieve what she has done since. 
That seems a fair point. 
But why is something that happened 15 years ago news? The message can't be "drugs are bad" because we all know where she is now.  But there is nothing on this spread about redemption, about recovery, about how she got herself out of this mess, about where people in the grip of drugs can go to get help - not so much as a phone number. 
Nor does it point out that Jolie, as the daughter of a Hollywood star, had money behind her that others probably don't have.  
So SubScribe comes to the conclusion that the story is there just because it was available and because the Mail doesn't buy into the "Jolie is the new Audrey Hepburn" schtick (*see the panel on the right for recent coverage).
mail p3, 08-07-14
Or maybe the paper thought "we've had a go at the king, let's do the queen while we're at it".
The picture above is yesterday's page three. It claimed that Amal Alamuddin's mother is not overjoyed at the prospect of her marrying the world's most elusive bridegroom. 
Picture
Close family friends told the Daily Mail that 66-year-old Mrs Alamuddin wants her daughter to find a man within the strict Muslim sect to which her family belongs.
Originally from Lebanon, the Alamuddins are a prominent family within the Druze community, a medieval offshoot which forbids marriage to outsiders. 
A Lebanese family friend who lives in London told the Mail: "You would think Amal has hit the jackpot with George Clooney, but Baria is not happy. 
"She thinks Amal can do better. She has been telling half of Beirut, in fact anyone that will listen, there are 500,000 Druze. Are none of them good enough for her?"
The report goes on to say: "Those who marry outside the sect are excommunicated, while some members have been killed for choosing partners of other religions."
Mail Online went even further:
Picture
There can be harsh penalties for those Druze who marry outsiders.Several women have been murdered for disobeying the rules. Last year a Sunni Muslim man had his penis severed by the male relatives of a Druze woman who defied her family by marrying him.
The friend added: "There have a been a few jokes in the family about the same thing happening to George!"
Clooney was not amused. He issued a statement to USA Today, accusing the Mail of routinely making up stories and saying he didn't care about that, but that in this case it was dangerous because it stirred up hatred.
Picture
The irresponsibility, in this day and age, to exploit religious differences where none exist, is at the very least negligent and more appropriately dangerous. We have family members all over the world, and the idea that someone would inflame any part of that world for the sole reason of selling papers should be criminal.
He also said that the Mail story had a fundamental error - that his fiancée was not Druze, which seems to be something that should have been fairly easily checkable.
The Mail responded today by  saying that it had not made up the story, which had come from a reliable source. It nevertheless apologised and  removed  it from its website.
The Mail is now Britain's most read news producer, if you take print and online together. The website is the world's biggest online news site.
 It lives and dies on celebrity and its "sidebar of shame", so it is important that it can distinguish between the publicity-craving antics of the likes of the Kardashians, Josie Cunningham and I'm a Celebrity contestants, and people who don't want every facet of their lives to be public property, who do care about decency and accuracy.
That is not the same as saying that Hollywood "royalty"  such as Jolie and Clooney should be given a better deal than everyone else. It means that if the trashier end wants to peddle nonsense about themselves, let them. But if you're going to put a story on your front page or page three about anyone, it's a good idea to ensure that (a) it's true and (b) that there is a valid public interest.
times front page
times tax spread
Which takes us to The Times. Alexi Mostrous and Billy Kember have been working hard on a series of articles about aggressive tax avoidance schemes. Jimmy Carr and Gary Barlow have felt the heat; today they examine a scheme called Liberty, in which George Michael, Sir Michael Caine, four of the Arctic Monkeys and Katie Melua are said to have invested. Lawyers, doctors, footballers and big businessmen are also reported to have sheltered money from the taxman using the scheme. 
That is particularly interesting, because while you might believe that pop stars would let accountants get on with all matters financial, you would expect lawyers and tycoons to  take a closer interest. But of course they are not so compelling in bringing the story to the public.
Guardian tax
Mirror tax
Both the Guardian and the Mirror are also on the tail of people hiding money from the taxman today (HMRC is obviously doing a good PR job behind the scenes). The Mirror focuses on Ingenious Media - the subject of previous Times stories - and names the Beckhams, Ant and Dec, Andrew Lloyd Webber and Steven Gerrard. The Guardian looks at a Jersey branch of Kleinwort Benson and names political donors. 
What is different about the Times's coverage is the way it tries to explain what has been going on - and the way it repeatedly points out that these people are doing nothing illegal. There is a panel on the spread today headlined "How Liberty works...and why we are exposing its members".  It is excellent.
But is it fair to use Katy Melua, who is said to have paid back all the tax she avoided, as a whipping post when judges who were probably more aware are not named? 
Tricky one that. It's important to get people to read the story. Let's see if the lawyers, doctors and dentists are exposed later on.
daily star
star inside
And so finally to the Daily Star and Miley Cyrus. The front page is shameful. This is not an image that should be seen on the lower shelves of a news stand by children popping into the paper shop for some sweets on their way to school. The picture is a promo still and the headline is a deceit, but the inside has it spot on: "a vid too far". Exactly. Miley Cyrus has form with Wrecking Ball. She is an attention-seeking teenager. For her own sake and for the sake of our own young people, the Star should have denied her that attention. 


The Mail and 
Angelina Jolie

May 22
Story alleging that Jolie and Pitt still owe the Dreamworks theme park in Australia money for an after-hours visit

May 22
Story saying women are having unnecessary double mastectomies because of the "Angelina effect" after her statements about her own surgery

May 31
Story saying that Jolie feels closer to her adopted children than to her genetic offspring

June 12
Jolie in Britain for summit on rape as a weapon of war. Mail takes William Hague and David Cameron to task for schmoozing with Jolie rather than dealing with Iraq insurgency, Syria and other vital world issues

June 14
Liz Jones writes a feature saying that people like Jolie make her want to "hurl".
Picture
The owner of the fashion brand I travelled with on that occasion told me, out of all the big names – movie stars and supermodels – she has taken to the slums, not one had ever offered up cash.
Which is why the sight of Angelina Jolie, who has just been made a honorary dame, at the London summit on ending  sexual violence in conflict last week made me want to hurl.
She is offering up her time, of course. She has plucked enough infants from poverty, to be sure – as well as adopting children, she also sponsors orphans, but this is still perpetuating the idea these people need rescuing, rather than fair trade and a few decades free from civil war. 


June 28
Story saying the secret of Jolie's perfect skin is that  spends £15,000 a year on facials from 
a top dermatologist 

July 9
Video showing Jolie apparently after taking heroin and/or cocaine

The Mail and 
George Clooney

The Clooney statement to USA Today
Picture
I want to speak to the irresponsibility of Monday's Daily Mail report.

I seldom respond to tabloids, unless it involves someone else and their safety or well being. 

The Daily Mail has printed a completely fabricated story about my fiancée's mother opposing our marriage for religious reasons. It says Amal's mother has been telling "half of Beirut" that she's against the wedding. It says they joke about traditions in the Druze religion that end up with the death of the bride.

Let me repeat that: the death of the bride.

First of all, none of the story is factually true. Amal's mother is not Druze. She has not been to Beirut since Amal and I have been dating, and she is in no way against the marriage — but none of that is the issue.

I'm, of course, used to the Daily Mail making up stories — they do it several times a week — and I don't care. If they fabricate stories of Amal being pregnant, or that the marriage will take place on the set ofDownton Abbey, or that I'm running for office, or any number of idiotic stories that they sit at their computers and invent, I don't care.

But this lie involves larger issues. The irresponsibility, in this day and age, to exploit religious differences where none exist, is at the very least negligent and more appropriately dangerous. We have family members all over the world, and the idea that someone would inflame any part of that world for the sole reason of selling papers should be criminal.

I'm the son of a newsman; I accept the idea that freedom of speech can be an inconvenience to my private life from time to time, but this story, like so many others, is picked up by hundreds of other outlets citing the Daily Mail as their source, including Boston.com, New York Daily News, Gulf News, Emirates 24/7 and so on.


The Daily Mail, more than any other organisation that calls itself news, has proved time and time again that facts make no difference in the articles they make up. And when they put my family and my friends in harm's way, they cross far beyond just a laughable tabloid and into the arena of inciting violence.


They must be so very proud.


The Mail response
Picture
On Monday MailOnline carried an article which alleged that the mother of George Clooney’s fiancée Amal Alamuddin would prefer her daughter to be married to a member of the Druze religious group.

Yesterday Mr Clooney said the story was 'completely fabricated' and exploited 'religious differences where none exist.'

In a statement MailOnline said: 'The story was not a fabrication but supplied in good faith by a reputable and trusted freelance journalist.

'She based her story on conversations with a long standing contact who has strong connections with senior members of the Lebanese community in the UK and the Druze in Beirut.

'We only became aware of Mr Clooney’s concerns this morning and have launched a full investigation.

'However, we accept Mr Clooney’s assurance that the story is inaccurate and we apologise to him, Miss Amal Alamuddin and her mother, Baria, for any distress caused.

'We have removed the article from our website and will be contacting Mr Clooney’s representatives to discuss giving him the opportunity to set the record straight.'



comments powered by Disqus

Please sign up for SubScribe updates  
(no spam, no more than one every week or two)

I'd like to become a SubScriber

* indicates required
Quick links

Picture
Main sections:
The industry
Press freedom
Press regulation
The schedule
Phone hacking
News judgment
Regionals
Picture
About SubScribe
Send an email
Blogs:
Pictures and spreads
Editor's blog
Press Box
Style Counsel
You have to laugh
OpEd
Front page reviews
Picture
The old blog