• SubScribe commentary
  • The schedule
    • Celebrities >
      • Robin Williams and suicide reporting
      • George Clooney v Daily Mail, round 3
      • Are we playing fair with celebrities?
      • L'Wren Scott's death and Mick Jagger's grief
      • Jill Dando
      • Alain de Botton and Philip Seymour Hoffman
      • Wendi Deng and Rebekah Wade love letters
      • Elizabeth Hurley
      • Gwyneth Paltrow
      • William Roache
    • Crime >
      • The release of Harry Roberts
      • Alan Henning and Alice Gross
      • Dave Lee Travis and Operation Yewtree
      • Rotherham child sex exploitation
      • Operation Tuleta
      • Rolf Harris and Andy Coulson sentencing
      • Maxine Carr's wedding
      • Ann Maguire stabbing
      • Stephen Lawrence and police corruption: time to sit up and take notice
      • The Mirror and Jill Dando
      • William Roache acquitted
      • Rape cases never have a happy ending
      • Lee Rigby and the law of contempt
      • Michael Le Vell: don't shoot the messenger
      • Madeleine McCann: missing an opportunity
      • Maria the 'Greek Madeleine'
    • Foreign Affairs >
      • David Haines and Isis propaganda
      • The murder of Steven Sotloff
      • James Foley murdered
      • Nigeria's abducted girls and massacre
      • Kidnapped Nigerian schoolgirls
      • Al Jazeera on trial: why should we care about journalists?
      • Al Jazeera on trial: the final session
      • Al Jazeera on trial: Abdullah Elshamy
      • Al Jazeera on trial: Peter Greste
      • Al Jazeera on trial: the court hearings
      • Peter Greste sent back to jail as Al-Jazeera journalists' trial is adjourned
      • Al-Jazeera journalists refused bail in Egypt
      • Frontline reporting
      • Putin, the Man of Destiny, and dreams of a Eurasian empire
      • Putin wants more than Crimea, he wants half of Ukraine
      • Ukraine revolution and the threat to the West
      • Obama's selfie
      • Typhoon Haiyan
    • Gender Issues >
      • It takes all sorts to make a family
      • This is what a flawed feminist campaign looks like
      • A level results day: bring on the token boys
      • Kellie Maloney faces the world
      • Cheerleading
      • Pregnant soldiers
      • Women in trouble for getting ahead
      • Doris Lessing, Helen Mirren and silly sexist tokenism
      • Bank notes campaign
    • Health and Beauty >
      • Ebola
      • Ashya King and the force of authority
      • Robin Williams and suicide reporting
      • Sun boobs with page 3 breast cancer campaign
      • Stephen's story: did the Press help his cause or take over his life?
      • Anorexia, bulimia and high-achieving students
      • Colchester cancer scandal
      • New year diets
      • Food for thought: will red meat kill you?
    • Obituary >
      • Robin Williams and suicide reporting
      • Chapman Pincher
      • Rik Mayall and the trouble with death
      • Tony Benn: why we shouldn't speak ill of the dead
      • Thatcher and Crow: speaking ill of the dead
      • Bob Crow wins last media battle
      • Fred Sanger
      • Nelson Mandela
      • Doris Lessing
    • Politics >
      • Poppymania
      • Cameron's tax cut promise
      • Brooks Newmark sting
      • Scottish referendum >
        • Scottish referendum: the final editions
        • Scottish referendum miscellany
        • The Queen speaks
      • Politicians need their holidays too
      • Cameron's reshuffle: bring on the women
      • Food banks
      • The European elections audit >
        • Election audit: the last wordle
        • Election audit: Daily Mail
        • Election audit: The Times
        • Election audit: Daily Express
        • Election audit: Daily Mirror
        • Election audit: The Independent
        • Election audit: Guardian
        • Election audit: Daily Telegraph
        • Election audit: The Sun
      • Maria Miller
      • The blue-rinse bingo Budget
      • Harman, Hewitt and the paedophiles
      • Hewitt apologises and the Sun picks up the cudgels
      • Mail v Labour trio, day 6: Harman capitulates and the bully wins
      • David Miranda detention matters to us all
      • Education >
        • A level results day: bring on the token boys
      • Immigration >
        • A year of xenophobia
        • The Express and immigration
      • The Royal Family >
        • Prince Charles and the floods
        • Prince George
      • Sport >
        • Cheerleading
        • Kelly Gallagher beats the world
        • Why is football more important than all the news?
        • Jenny Jones struggles against Kate and ManU
      • The weather >
        • Smog
  • Journalists in court
  • Phone hacking
  • The Brooks-Coulson trial
    • Hacking trial: sentences
    • Hacking trial: commentary
    • Hacking trial: background
    • Hacking trial: reportage and comment
    • Hacking trial: press coverage
    • Hacking trial: verdict and reaction
    • Hacking trial: sentencing hearing
    • Hacking trial: mitigation
    • Hacking trial: Rebekah speaks
    • Hacking trial: mainstream Press
    • Hacking trial: periodicals
    • Hacking trial: Guardian
    • Hacking trial: Independent
    • Hacking trial: The Times
    • Hacking trial: Daily Telegraph
    • Hacking trial: The whitetops
    • Hacking trial: The redtops
    • Hacking trial: evidence
  • Nationals
    • Express
    • Guardian
    • Independent
    • The i
    • Mail
    • Mirror
    • Daily Star
    • Sun
    • Telegraph
    • Times
  • OpEd
    • OpEd: UK politics 24-12-14
    • OpEd: 23-12-14 Christmas
    • OpEd: 22-12-14 UK politics
    • OpEd: 19-12-14 North Korea
    • OpEd: 18-12-14 British politics
    • OpEd: 17-12-14 UK politics
    • OpEd: 16-12-14 UK politics
    • OpEd: CIA torture 15-12-14
    • OpEd: UK politics 12-12-14
    • OpEd: CIA torture 11-12-14
    • OpEd: CIA torture 10-12-14
    • OpEd: British politics 09-12-14
    • OpEd: British politics 08-12-14
    • OpEd: Autumn Statement 05-12-14
    • OpEd: Autumn Statement 04-12-14
    • OpEd: Autumn Statement 03-12-14
    • OpEd: Gordon Brown 02-12-14
    • OpEd: Black Friday 01-12-14
    • OpEd: Scottish finance 28-11-14
    • OpEd: European politics 27-11-14
    • OpEd: David Mellor 26-11-14
    • OpEd: Lewis Hamilton 25-11-14
    • OpEd: British politics 24-11-14
    • OpEd: British politics 21-11-14
    • OpEd: British politics 20-11-14
    • OpEd: British politics 19-11-14
    • OpEd: British politics 18-11-14
    • OpEd: British politics 17-11-14
    • OpEd: Labour 14-11-14
    • OpEd: forex scandal 13-11-14
    • OpEd: British politics 12-11-14
    • OpEd: the Labour Party 11-11-14
    • OpEd: Ed Miliband 10-11-14
    • OpEd: British politics 07-11-14
    • OpEd: British politics 06-11-14
    • OpEd: British politics 05-11-14
    • OpEd: British politics 04-11-14
    • OpEd: space tourism 03-11-14
    • OpEd: British politics 31-10-14
    • OpEd: immigration 30-10-14
    • OpEd: immigration 29-10-14
    • OpEd: British politics 28-10-14
    • OpEd: British politics 27-10-14
    • OpEd: NHS 24-10-14
    • OpEd: British politics 23-10-14
    • OpEd: Ukip 22-10-14
    • OpEd: Britain and EU 21-10-14
    • OpEd: British politics 20-10-14
    • OpEd: Lord Freud 17-10-14
    • OpEd: British politics 16-10-14
    • OpEd: British politics 15-10-14
    • OpEd: British politics 14-10-14
    • OpEd: British politics 13-10-14
    • OpEd: Isis and UK politics 10-10-14
    • OpEd: British politics 09-10-14
    • OpEd: British politics 08-09-14
    • OpEd: LibDem conference 07-10-14
    • OpEd: British politics 06-10-14
    • OpEd: party conferences 03-10-14
    • OpEd: Cameron's speech 02-10-14
    • OpEd: Conservative conference 01-10-14
    • OpEd: Conservative conference 30-09-14
    • OpEd: Conservative conference 29-09-14
    • OpEd: War on Isis 26-09-14
    • OpEd: Labour conference 25-09-14
    • OpEd: Miliband's speech 24-09-14
    • OpEd: Labour conference 23-09-14
    • OpEd: Referendum fallout 22-09-14
    • OpEd: Scottish referendum 19-09-14
    • OpEd: Scottish referendum 18-09-14
    • OpEd: Scottish referendum 17-09-14
    • OpEd: Scottish referendum 16-09-14
    • OpEd: Scottish referendum 15-09-14
    • OpEd: Scottish referendum 12-09-14
    • OpEd: Scottish referendum 11-09-14
    • OpEd: Scottish referendum 10-09-14
    • OpEd: Scottish referendum 09-09-14
    • OpEd: Scottish referendum 08-09-14
    • OpEd: Scottish referendum 05-09-14
    • OpEd: Nato and Isis threat 04-09-14
    • OpEd: Scottish independence 03-09-14
    • OpEd: Nude photographs 02-09-14
    • OpEd: British politics 01-09-14
    • OpEd: Ukip defection 29-08-14
    • OpEd: Rotherham sex abuse 28-08-14
    • OpEd: Islamic militants 27-08-14
    • OpEd: Middle East 26-08-14
    • OpEd: James Foley 22-08-14
    • OpEd: James Foley 21-08-14
    • OpEd: British politics 20-08-14
    • OpEd: Iraq 19-08-14
    • OpEd: Iraq 18-08-14
    • OpEd: A levels 15-08-14
    • OpEd: Iraq 14-08-14
    • OpEd: Robin Williams 13-08-14
    • OpEdL Iraq 12-08-14
    • OpEd: Iraq 11-08-14
    • OpEd: Boris Johnson 08-08-14
    • OpEd: Boris Johnson 07-08-14
    • OpEd: Warsi resignation 06-08-14
    • OpEd: First World War centenary 05-08-14
    • OpEd: Gaza 04-08-14
    • OpEd: British politics 01-08-14
    • OpEd: Gaza 31-07-14
    • OpEd: British politics 30-07-14
    • OpEd: British politics 29-07-14
    • OpEd: Gaza 28-07-14
    • OpEd: Gaza 25-07-14
    • OpEd: EU and Russia 24-07-14
    • OpEd: Flight MH17 23-07-14
    • OpEd: Flight MH17 22-07-14
    • OpEd: Flight MH17 21-07-14
    • oped: Gaza 18-07-14
    • OpEd: Cameron's reshuffle 17-07-14
    • OpEd: Cameron's reshuffle 16-07-14
    • OpEd: Cameron's reshuffle 15-07-14
    • OpEd: British politics 14-07-2014
    • OpEd: public sector strikes 11-07-14
    • OpEd: public sector strikes 10-07-14
    • OpEd: sex abuse 09-07-14
    • OpEd Sex abuse 08-07-14
    • OpEd: Westminster child abuse 07-07-2014
    • OpEd: Middle East 04-07-14
    • OpEd: Ed Miliband 03-07-14
    • OpEd British politics: 02-07-14
    • OpEd: edeucation 01-07-14
    • OpEd: Britain and Europe 30-06-14
    • OpEd: Britain and Europe 27-06-14
    • OpEd: Luis Suárez 26-06-14
    • OpEd: Iraq 25-06-14
    • OpEd: British politics 24-06-14
    • OpEd: Iraq 23-06-14
    • OpEd: Iraq 20-06-14
    • OpEd: British politics, 19-06-14
    • OpEd: British politics, 18-06-2014
    • OpEd: Iraq 17-06-14
    • OpEd: Tony Blair 16-06-14
    • OpEd: Iraq 13-06-14
    • OpEd: Oxfam, baby buggies, World Cup 12-06-14
    • OpEd: education and British values 11-06-14
    • OpEd: extremist education 10-06-14
    • OpEd: May v Gove 09-06-14
  • The columnists
  • Regionals
    • Regional Press Awards 2013
    • Local newspaper week
    • Local papers matter
    • Reading Chronicle and football hooliganism
    • Time for change
    • Monty's vision
    • The Full Monty: the Local World vision put into practice
    • The Pirates of Parkham
    • Colchester cancer scandal
  • Backnumbers
    • Weekend papers Dec 27-28
    • Front pages Dec 22-26, 2014
    • Weekend papers Dec 20-21
    • Front pages Dec 15-19
    • Weekend front pages Dec 13-14
    • Front pages Dec 8-12
    • Weekend papers Dec 6-7
    • Front pages Dec 1-5
    • Weekend papers Nov 29-30
    • Front pages Nov 24-28
    • Weekend papers Nov 22-23
    • Front pages Nov 17-21
    • Weekend papers Nov 15-16
    • Front pages Nov 10-14
    • Weekend papers Nov 8-9
    • Front pages Nov 3-7
    • Weekend papers Nov 1-2
    • Front pages Oct 27-31
    • Weekend papers Oct 25-26, 2014
    • Front pages Oct 20-24
    • Weekend papers Oct 18-19, 2014
    • Front pages Oct 12-17
    • Front pages Oct 5-11
    • Front pages Sept 28-Oct 4
    • front pages Sept 21-27
    • Front pages Sept 14-20
    • front pages Sept 7-13 2014
    • front pages Aug 31-Sep 6
    • Front pages Aug 24-30, 2014
    • Front pages August 17-23, 2014
    • Front pages, Aug 10-16, 2014
    • Front pages, Aug 3-9, 2014
    • Front pages July 27-August2, 2014
    • Front pages July 20-26, 2014
    • front pages July 13-19, 2014
    • Front pages: July 6-12, 2014
    • Front pages June 29-July 5, 2014
    • Front pages June 22-28, 2014
    • Front pages June 15-21
    • Front pages June 8-14, 2014
    • Front pages June 1-7, 2014
    • Nationals May 25-31
    • Front pages May 18-24 >
      • Press review: 24-05-14
      • Press review: 21-05-14
      • Press review: 20-05-14
    • Front pages May 11-17 >
      • Press review 15-05-14
      • Press review 14-05-14
      • Press review 13-05-14
      • Press review 12-05-14
    • front pages May 4-10, 2014 >
      • The review 09-05-14
      • The review 08-05-2014
      • The review 07-05-14
    • Front pages April 27-May 3 2014
    • Front pages April 20-26, 2014
    • Front pages April 13-19
    • Front pages April 6-12, 2014
    • The front pages March 30-April 5
    • The front pages March 23-29, 2014
    • front pages march 16-22
    • front pages March 9-15, 2014
    • front pages March 2-8, 2014
    • front pages Feb 23-Mar 1 2014
    • front pages Feb 16-22, 2014
    • The front pages Feb 9-15 2014
    • The front pages Feb 3-8, 2014
    • The front pages January 2014
  • You have to laugh
  • Blog archive
  • About SubScribe
  • Join the SubScribers
  • Contact us
  • Cookie policy


Rotherham scandal isn't about political correctness...

Picture
Our conservative estimate is that approximately 1400 children were sexually exploited from 1997 to 2013...It is hard to describe the appalling nature of the abuse that child victims suffered. They were raped by multiple perpetrators, trafficked to other towns and cities in the north of England, abducted, beaten, and intimidated. There were examples
of children who had been doused in petrol and threatened with being set alight, threatened with guns, made to witness brutally violent rapes and threatened they would be next if they told anyone. Girls as young as 11 were raped by large numbers of male perpetrators
- extract from Professor Alexis Jay's report on child sex exploitation in Rotherham


..it's about chauvinism, class, complacency and incompetence

frightened girl
Wednesday 27 August, 2014 
A newspaper never reveals its soul so clearly as in its treatment of a big story with many strands, such as yesterday's Rotherham report.
What is the most important factor: the scale of the abuse, the affect on the victims, the perpetrators, the racial element, the authorities' failings, even the geography? Is this a human story, a cultural story, a political story?
Or is it just another report of secondary importance to concerns about illegal immigrants, "reality TV", the return of an ageing pop queen and Manchester United's thrashing by the team formerly known as Wimbledon?

The "new" news yesterday was the publication of a report by Professor Alexis Jay, who had been asked by Rotherham Council to look into the sexual exploitation of children in the town between 1997 and last year.
Her findings were shocking. 
  • At least 1,400 children had been abused over those 16 years. "Over the first twelve years covered by this Inquiry, the collective failures of political and officer leadership were blatant," Professor Jay wrote;
  • Evidence that there was a serious problem - including three formal reports - was repeatedly presented to police, social services and councillors, but it was disbelieved, suppressed or ignored;
  • A third of the children were known to social services, many were in care, and police treated victims with contempt, assuming that they were involved in prostitution. They regarded them as "deviant, promiscuous and a waste of time;
  • There was friction between the statutory children's social care department and a project called Risky Business set up in 1997 by a group of youth workers to help children who were being exploited. Children referred to the council department by Risky Business "fell through the net" and were not treated with the priority they deserved. "It is almost as if the source of the referral from Risky Business was a pretext for attaching lower importance to it," Professor Jay wrote; 
  • Strategies to protect children at risk - particularly those in care homes - from exploitation were inadequate, as were those to provide help and counselling to young people who had been abused;
  • Child protection teams struggled with their workloads. At one point a group of professionals got together to monitor children being abused - or at risk of abuse - but managers offered little help and the staff were overwhelmed by the numbers. By 2009, the Rotherham children's social care department was "acutely understaffed, overstretched and struggling to cope with demand";
  • The director of children's services did not regard sexual exploitation as the top priority bercause  victims accounted for only 2.3% of her department's caseload, neglect was a "much more significant problem"; 
  • The culture of the council was macho, sexist and bullying. Members accessed pornography on council computers, one woman was told to wear shorter skirts to meetings and she'd "get on better", a senior councillor was heard on four occasions to say: "You women are only good for cooking, cleaning and darning"; 
  • Two of the three reports presented to the council linked the exploitatiion with gangs, guns and drugs. The overwhelming majority of the perpetrators were Pakistani and victims spoke of their attackers being "Asian", but there was no attempt to engage or involve the Pakistain community in tackling the issue.
The leader of the council resigned yesterday, but no one else has been disciplined. The forrmer councillor responsible for children's services is now the South Yorkshire Police and Crime Commissioner. He has resigned from the Labour Party, but not from his position.

So what did the papers make of all this?

Abuse front pages
Independent and Telegraph, Rotherham
For the Mirror, i, Guardian and Times, the key point is the scale of the abuse and the failure of anyone in authority to act. The Mirror and Times mention the racial aspect in their subdecks. Neither the Independent nor the Telegraph mentions the number in their main headings, choosing instead to focus on the idea of a town that failed its children. The Independent mentions the Asian angle in the secondary headline, the Telegraph, like the i, doesn't use the line in any head on the front or inside.

For the Sun, Mail and Express (when it gets round to reporting the story on page 9) the main issue is political correctness. The Sun and  Mail see it as more important to attack the PC cowards/brigade than to tell readers who has been betrayed and how.  This is the Mail's lead intro:
Picture
At least 1,400 girls were left to be abused by Asian men because the authorities feared being labelled racist, a damning report said yesterday. Over a 16-year period, children as young as 11 were sexually exploited by gangs of men – almost all of them of Pakistani origin.
But council officials suppressed evidence of the crimes to avoid causing damage to ‘community cohesion’.

Sun Rotherham
Mail Rotherham
Star Rotherham
Daily Express, Rotherham
The Star, in thrall to Big Brother, has only a teaser on the front, but then it produces what is probably the best at-a-glance precis on page 2.

How fair were these interpretations of the Jay report?
It is true that one of the objectives in Professor Jay's terms of reference was to "consider specifically whether there was evidence of the council or other agency not taking appropriate actions as a consequence of concerns regarding racial or ethnic sensitivities".
She clearly concludes that there was such evidence. But she equally clearly does not conclude that 1,400 children were left to be abused because of that failure. Where she does point to nervousness about being seen as racist, it is generally with the caveat "in the earlier years". 
She does not suggest anywhere that political correctness allowed abuse to continue unchecked for 16 years. Indeed, she states that her team was confident that in some instances where concerns were raised by staff, ethnic issues had not influenced decision-making.

It is apparent from Professor Jay's analysis of the council's workings that the failings were many and widespread. 
Yet the Mirror, Express and Star all make the same cause-and-effect link between the fear of being seen as racist and the continued failure to tackle the abuse. The Telegraph says the children were exploited  after officials turned a blind eye "for fear of being labelled racist". The Times and the Guardian mention this fear in the first few pars, but without making it the main point; the Independent leaves it to the middle of the second leg of its inside spread lead.

The ethnicity of the guilty men is a central feature in the pattern of abuse in Rotherham  (and in other northern towns), and some council  officials were certainly inhibited because of it -  not only because they did not want to be branded racist, but also because they were afraid of providing ammunition for far right groups.
But this was a regime unwilling to confront the abuse at all - regardless of who was behind it. This was a dysfunctional council that operated in a macho atmosphere of bullying and sexism.  In this world women were lesser beings, the girls were treated with contempt and disdain,  and discussion of subjects such as sex abuse was almost impossible. 
One council officer, worried about a budget overspend, ranted for an hour about the cost of  "too many looked-after children".  In a letter to the chief executive, the outgoing director of safeguarding wrote that when challenged to provide evidence, he became aggressive and antagonistic.  Asked to stop shouting, he responded by saying that shouting was the only way to "get through to these people" and he persisted for over an hour, swearing frequently.  The director of safeguarding described the experience as  "intimidating, humiliating, bullying and entirely professionally unacceptable".

If the council was unwilling to confront the whole issue, so, too, are today's papers. For the overwhelming impression from the reports is that the scandal was about  Asian men abusing white Yorkshire lasses. Except that they abused Asian girls and Eastern European girls too. 

This is a story about a group of very nasty people, who happened to be Pakistani in origin, who did some very nasty things to vulnerable children - mostly girls, but some boys as well. They are the guilty men. 
The Jay report details what they did in a series of case studies that makes horrific reading. 
The councillors, officials and police who failed to protect so many children are also culpable. But not because they were trying to be politically correct, rather the reverse: there was nothing politically correct about their outlook. They were bigoted, chauvinistic and sexist; they didn't believe - or want to believe - that the abuse was as widespread as it was, and they didn't accept that the children were innocent victims. They were unreliable troublemakers who weren't worth bothering about.
 Abusers, remember, are smart at picking on the vulnerable. As with Jimmy Savile and other predatory paedophiles, they will prey on children in care who are not seen as credible.
Once that culture of disbelief had set in, it was almost impossible to shift.
Andrew Norfolk
It is to our trade's great credit that Andrew Norfolk of The Times, above, pushed and pushed and pushed on this so that this inquiry was set up and we have reached this point today. His investigative work in Rotherham rightly earned him the Paul Foot and Orwell prizes.
So let us not sully his efforts and betray those children again with simplistic "blame the PC brigade" headlines that turn a town's tragedy into an opportunity for a bit of "I'm not racist, but..." propaganda.
Child protection is not easy  - especially when the children are wilful, deluded, precocious.  Rotherham is in the dock today for being too slow, too blind, too complacent. But remember Cleveland  was also in the dock once -  for being too quick, too all-seeing, too eager. Nor was Rotherham alone in its misunderstanding of  (or refusal to acknowledge) the nature of the sexual exploitation that, as Andrew Norfolk uncovered, was replicated in towns across the North of England - Rochdale, Blackburn, Manchester, Derby and south to Oxford.

Yes, race was a huge factor in the pattern of abuse,  but the fear of being branded as racist was a very small factor in the overall failings of the police, child protection staff and elected councillors. They need to sort themselves out.
For the most chilling sentence in the report comes on the opening page:
Picture
This abuse is not confined to the past but continues to this day

Read Professor Alexis Jay's report in full here

What Jay said about ethnicity
Alexis Jay
Picture
Within the council, we found no evidence of children’s social care staff being influenced by concerns about the ethnic origins of suspected perpetrators ... In the broader organisational context, however, there was a widespread perception that messages conveyed by some senior people in the council and also the police, were to 'downplay' the ethnic dimensions of CSE. Unsurprisingly, frontline staff appeared to be confused as to what they were supposed to say and do and what would be interpreted as 'racist'... the approach of avoiding public discussion of the issues was ill judged.

Picture
There is no simple link between race and child sexual exploitation, and across the UK the greatest numbers of perpetrators of CSE are white men...In Rotherham, the majority of known perpetrators were of Pakistani heritage.

Picture
Some councillors seemed to think it was a one-off problem, which they hoped would go away. Several staff described their nervousness about identifying the ethnic origins of perpetrators for fear of being thought racist; others remembered clear direction from their managers not to do so

Picture
[Dr Angie Heal] reported in 2006 that young people in Rotherham believed that the police dared not act against Asian youths for fear of allegations of racism. This perception was echoed  by some young people we met during, but was not supported by specific examples.

Picture
Staff in children’s social care said that when writing reports on CSE cases, they were advised by their managers to be cautious about referring to the ethnicity of the perpetrators.

Picture
All the senior officers we interviewed were asked whether ethnic considerations influenced their decision making. All were unequivocal that this did not happen. However, several involved in operational management of services reported some attempts to pressurise them into changing their approach to some issues. This mainly affected the support given to Pakistani-heritage women fleeing domestic violence, where a small number of councillors had demanded that social workers reveal the whereabouts of these women or effect reconciliation... the inquiry team was confident that ethnic issues did not influence decision-making in individual cases.

Picture
Frontline staff did not report personal experience of attempts to influence their practice or decision making because of ethnic issues. Those who had involvement in CSE were acutely aware of these issues and recalled a general nervousness in the earlier years about discussing them, for fear of being thought racist.

Picture
The issue of race, regardless of ethnic group, should be tackled as an absolute priority if it is known to be a significant factor in the criminal activity of organised abuse in any local community. There was little evidence of such action being taken in Rotherham in the earlier years.

Picture
Several councillors believed that by opening up these issues they could be 'giving oxygen' to racist perspectives that might in turn attract extremist political groups and threaten community cohesion. To some extent this concern was valid, with the apparent targeting of the town by groups such as the English Defence League.
The Deputy Council Leader (2011-2014) from the Pakistani-heritage community was clear that he had not understood the scale of the CSE problem until 2013...he thought the convictions in 2010 were 'a one-off, isolated case', and not an example of a more deep-rooted problem of Pakistani-heritage perpetrators targeting young white girls. This was at best naïve, and at worst ignoring a politically inconvenient truth.


comments powered by Disqus

Please sign up for SubScribe updates  
(no spam, no more than one every week or two)

I'd like to become a SubScriber

* indicates required
Quick links

Picture
Main sections:
The industry
Press freedom
Press regulation
The schedule
Phone hacking
News judgment
Regionals
Picture
About SubScribe
Send an email
Blogs:
Pictures and spreads
Editor's blog
Press Box
Style Counsel
You have to laugh
OpEd
Front page reviews
Picture
The old blog